In
demeanour, he does not stoke a crowd. His rhetoric, even when on fire, does not
burn down a leaf. He walks even with dignity, like one accustomed to the
deference of crowds. He calls himself a Jew, in the pious not in the symbolic
terms that accommodates modern Christians. Bespectacled, and sometimes with a
walking stick and a fan, he conveys the carriage of an elder even though he is
in his middle years.
When he
addresses a crowd, Nnamdi Kanu comes away more as a balm than an argument.
Maybe
that is why he is dangerous. Men do not have to carry the fierce visage and
towering diction of an Odumegwu Ojukwu to send shudder to a ruling elite. After
all, Awo had no gift of the garb in the 1960’s when he soared in the courts and
in rallies. The soft-spoken swagger of the Ikenne denizen piqued the men of
power enough to consign him to the confines of solitude. The power of
suggestion sometimes comes in the conviction of kings than in the laws of the
monarchy. De Gaulle was no orator. Neither was Washington. Pol Pot had a silky
voice.
Whether
we like it or not, we have made Nnamdi Kanu into a substance, from being a mere
agitator in the shadows. He no longer is a poison-free serpent lurking in the
hedges of Nigerian unity. His neck sprouts out, his tongue forked, venom drips.
He has become more than a shadow of a titan, if a budding one.
It was
not his doing. During the Goodluck Jonathan years, we could have called him a
thing without a sting. If you thought so, you no longer think so after what
happened in the southeast about a week ago. IPOB called the indigenous people
of Biafra to stay home. Not since June 12, when a certain Ubani skulked the
government of the day, had a people shrunken out of daylight. Some say it was
out of the fear of punishment. Others counter that it was an act of
conscientious solidarity. Whatever it was, Igbos abandoned profits for cause.
The last time they started it, 30 months of gunshots, and bombs, and
fratricidal dislocations turned Nigeria into a hump of a nation. About a week
ago, the verve of Onitsha market, the cacophony of Owerri streets, the hum of
Umuahia offices paid homage with their silences to the subversion of a former
nonstarter.
He might
have been nothing, if the Igbo elite were not compelled, including the erudite
Pat Utomi, to ask the federal government to release the man. He was a subvert,
an anarchist even, a lawless, demoniac spirit in the federation. But the nation
had no right to subvert his rights in the pursuit of the purity of right in the
country. We made him a hero by undermining a straightforward adherence to our
own law. If we wanted to prosecute him, it meant we had the law on our side.
But if we overturned that law, we had no superior moral fibre or constitutional
claim. We made Kanu our equal in impunity.
So, while
he was in detention, we lionised him. We made him a rebel with a cause, and he
became caustic by the hour. His people cried for him, wielded sticks and
machetes for him, died for him. If that is not how a cause grows into myth, how
else?
Even a
certain story gained momentum when his handshake reportedly healed somebody of
stomach ache. Is that not how legends are made? In historical tales, we read of
men who die as gods. In our age of celebrity, we are like the stories of the
Greek myths where stalwarts live as gods. If Ogun, Oya, Sango, all died into
deity, we are not so patient. In our lifetime, some Nigerians saw Awo in the
moon. Black Scorpion, who stung Biafra many a time vanished in the battlefield.
In the slavery era, a black man equated Abraham Lincoln with Jesus, saying “he
walk the earth like de Lord.” French philosopher Montaigne mused in one of his
seminal essays why the greatest general of all time had a reputation of giving
off a scent while he sprinkled no oil on his body. He was, by nature, a scented
genius. So lofty was Alexander the Great that he did not need a “cologne” to please
the nostrils.
Little
anoints Kanu as a force more than the court’s decision to grant him bail. Why
is Sambo Dasuki still sulking behind bars? Why is the Shiite leader Ibrahim El
Zakzaky not out on Zaria alleys? They were three whom the federal government
have locked up against their rights. Forget the farce of conditions that the
judge gave Kanu. It was an act to save the faces of a besieged judiciary. It
was also to bow to the pressure of the streets and turbulence of media
onslaughts. Kanu has become a hot piece of yam we must either eat or leave on
the plate.
He might
not have been a gentleman. He might not have been one of the men to stand up to
the creme-de-la-creme of the Nigerian society. But we have, by our own fear of
him, made him an icon of sorts. When Buhari won the election and became
president, he looked at the man with contempt. It was naïve, and he must take
responsibility for alienating a people he should have clasped into his bosom,
the same way the DSS has given his Katsina home the divine right to gulp the
lion’s share of recruits into the intelligence agency. Nothing but limp logic
has tried to explain away that lopsided extravaganza.
Rebels
are not always for good causes even when they ride populist support. U.S.
confederate general Robert Lee was described as “legend incarnate” and a
gentleman. He led forces to support what he and his cohorts called state’s
rights. But it was a right to uphold slavery in a society that described blacks
as a fraction of the human soul. Some top southern politicians still echo that
toxic euphemism. Even Reagan roared his support for state’s rights. Trump is
the modern-day champion.
The
rebirth of Biafran anger must be traced to our habitual contempt to solve our
crisis. We keep hopping from crisis to another, hoping they will just go away.
Yakubu Gowon said there were no winners or losers. The Igbo believe they have
been treated as losers, a cry that was almost non-existent when Jonathan, who
called himself Ebele, garlanded them with choice positions. The Igbo caulked
voices of dissent. They felt part of the governing elite. A Kanu would have
been anathema then. He is an item today because Buhari made him.
How
Buhari handled Kanu and the Biafran uproar is an example of how not to make a
hero, especially in the aftermath of the relative quieting of Niger Delta
militancy.
No comments:
Post a Comment