Pages

Monday, March 24, 2014

NGO Empowers Grassroot Women...boosts their business





 Mrs Vera Ofili, the out going Chairperson of the club presenting her keynote address
 On behalf of the Mrs Ogosi, Mrs Ikemefuna Kate shared light on the organization's history and activities so far.
 Mrs Mary Ebeigbe, CEO-Dema Kitchen sharing practical entrepreneurial skills women need to excel and make great use of their loan. 
 Mrs Theresa Nwalupea presented a lecture on the importance of women empowerment towards community development.
 Chairman of the event, Ogbueshi Ikemefuna presenting cheques to beneficiaries.
 one of the beneficiaries, on behalf of others thanked the organization for their kind gesture.
 Barr. Theo Azinge, Chairman-Board of Directors, DBS-Asaba, represented the commissioner for Information, Mr. Chike Ogeah
 Chief J Iloba, the Olikaeze of Asaba represented the Asagba of Asaba at the function.
A cross section of the club members, invited guests and beneficiaries displaying their cheques.

Missing Funds: NASS, Auditor-General, Presidency And Constitutionalism



By Ezra Ijioma

Appearing before the House of Representatives Committee on Public Accounts in Abuja to defend its 2013 and 2014 budgets, the auditor-general for the federation, Mr. Samuel Ukura, said that his office does not have the constitutional powers to audit the accounts of Nigeria National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC) but that he has raised 20 ‘competent’ auditors to audit the accounts of the corporation. NNPC is in the public and legislative dock for claims by the suspended Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) governor, Lamido Sanusi Lamido, that it has failed to remit $49.8billion, later $10billion but now $20 billion proceeds of crude oil to the federation account.

Ukura was responding to a question on what his office is doing and has done to untie the knotty issue of the ‘unremitted’ funds. Very likely, in a bid to impress the House of Representatives, Ukura had said, “We had a budget of N60 million for training and we were able to train 20 officers who are presently on the field auditing the accounts of the NNPC.”

Section 85 (3) of the 1999 Constitution says: “Nothing in subsection (2) of this section shall be construed as authorising the auditor-general to audit the accounts of or appoint auditors for government statutory corporations, commissions, authorities, agencies, including all persons and bodies established by an Act of the National Assembly.”

NNPC is one of the statutory corporations. However, Section (85) (3) (i) empowers the auditor-general to provide; “a list of auditors qualified to be appointed by them as external auditors and from which the bodies shall appoint their external auditors, and (ii) provide guidelines on the level of fees to be paid to external auditors; and (b) comment on their annual accounts and auditor’s reports thereon. Also, subsection (4) of Section 85 mandates the auditor-general to “conduct checks of all government statutory corporations, commissions, authorities, agencies, including all persons and bodies established by an Act of the National Assembly.”

Obviously, the auditor-general for the federation (AuGF) should have a report of the audited accounts of NNPC and other statutory corporations as submitted to it by the external auditors. It is from this report that the AuGF can tell the nation the correct position of NNPC accounts and untie the knotty issue of ‘unremitted’ funds. 

But the AuGF does not have this record because it has not lived up to its constitutional responsibility. The AuGF has neither provided NNPC with a list of qualified auditors nor received a report of the NNPC’s audited accounts by the external auditor. Without the report from the external auditor, the AuGF cannot carry out any periodic checks of NNPC accounts.

Also, it cannot comment on NNPC’s annual account, as required by Section 85 (3) (a) of the 1999 constitution, because it does not have the external auditor’s report. By sending 20 ‘competent’ auditors to audit NNPC’s account, it is clear Ukura does not understand what his responsibilities are. What are his 20 ‘competent’ auditors going to check since they don’t have any report from the external auditor? Any action Ukura would take on NNPC account is dependent on what the report of the external auditor says. 

When LEADERSHIP newspapers wrote to AuGF for copies of these audit reports by the external auditor for the past five years, the AuGF hedged and failed to provide it. Also, it failed to provide the external auditor’s report when human rights lawyer Femi Falana requested for it. Ukura disclosed that his office faces “professional and ethical threats” in discharging its constitutional role of “carrying out the vetting and periodic checks of the accounts of government statutory corporations, commissions etc including the NNPC operations”.

This was in January and February this year, how then did those ‘professional and ethical threats’ disappear and that the AuGF can now mobilize 20 ‘competent’ auditors to audit NNPC accounts, which he had claimed he has no constitutional power to do?
Ukura is not the only one observing the Constitution in breach. 

The National Assembly, despite its sanctimonious posture, has not lived up to its constitutional responsibility.

"Don't be afraid to visit any part of Nigeria, APC tells President Jonathan"



 
 The All Progressives Congress (APC) has advised President Goodluck Jonathan, as the father of the nation and Commander-in-Chief of the armed forces, not to be afraid to visit any part of the country for whatever reasons.

In a statement issued in Lagos on Sunday by its Interim National Publicity Secretary, Alhaji Lai Mohanmed, the party reminded the President that he has not yet visited Yobe state, one month after the dastardly killing of many schoolchildren in the state, to commiserate with the government and the bereaved families.

It said the first month of the killings, which is Tuesday, provides another opportunity for the President to visit the state.

APC said since the President's planned return from his latest foray abroad on Tuesday coincides with the first month of the killings, he should fly straight to Yobe.

''As we said in our earlier statement on this issue on March 10th, 'far from being a mere formality, such a visit will provide great succour to the families of the victims, reassure them and other residents of the state that their government has not abandoned them to their fate, and also serve as a morale booster for our gallant troops who are battling the terrorists, against all odds','' it said.

APC reminded the President that since the killings, he has hosted a wasteful centennial celebration, travelled across Nigeria to illegally kick-start his campaign for the 2015 elections and journeyed to Namibia, Italy and The Netherlands, in a needless junketing that belies the massive security problems facing the country.

''Mr. President, charity begins at home. You cannot be engaging in photo-ops abroad when your country is burning,'' the party said.

It said President Jonathan's insensitive junketing and law-breaking campaign rallies across Nigeria best illustrate the old saying ''Nero fiddling while Rome burns''.
APC advised President Jonathan, as the father of the nation and Commander-in-Chief of the Nigerian armed forces, not to be afraid to visit any part of the country for whatever reason.

''In this case, President Jonathan's pointed avoidance of Yobe, where the death of innocent school children highlights the senseless nature of the Boko Haram insurgency, is a morale booster of sorts to the cowards who murdered those children
''If however the President has any reason why he does not want to visit the scene of the gruesome murders to commiserate with the bereaved families, he should tell Nigerians who have continued to wonder why he has been avoiding the state,'' the party said.

Alhaji Lai Mohammed
Interim National Publicity Secretary
All Progressives Congress (APC)
Lagos, March 23rd 2014




ANIOMA AS NIGERIA'S CRIMEA



Emeka Maduewesi
Fast-forward 2025. Nigeria has been divided along the current six Geo-political zones as autonomous nations. The instrument of mutual balkanization provides that any state desiring to opt out of her zone and join a contiguous zone may do so by referendum.

 The instrument was executed in 2020.

By 2024, ANIOMA people felt very marginalized in the South South Nation they now belong. They want out. But Anioma is not a state. The instrument of mutual balkanization did not provide for ethnic groups. 

While one group of ANIOMA's indigens assert that they are ethnic Igbo of NRI ancestry and would want to join their brethren in the South East Nation, another group claim Bini, or Yoruba, or Igala ancestry.

Things came to a head in 2025 when ANIOMA traditional rulers, mostly of NRI ancestry, met and signed a unilateral declaration of independence. The South South Nation arrested and detained all the ANIOMA traditional rulers that signed the instrument of unilateral declaration of independence. 

Crises erupts!

Will the South East Nation standby and watch or will they join their kith and kin across the Niger in their quest for independence for ANIOMA STATE? Will those ANIOMAs who claim other ancestry reject and resist the move?


"This House of Deceit Must Fall!"





Our African societies are very rich in proverbs, anecdotes and idioms. The Yoruba people richly say: ‘The house built with the saliva as the mixing agent cannot stand the seemingly feeble strength of Dew.”

This proverb fittingly describes the unwholesome deceit pervading the operations of the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC) and by extension, the Ministry of Petroleum resources. After his revelation of missing or unremitted $20Billion into the Federation Account by the NNPC, the President, Dr Goodluck Jonathan, under whose watch this malfeasance took place, suspended the CBN governor/ whistle blower, Mallam Sanusi Lamido Sanusi. Against unceasing, scurrilous attacks on his personality, Mallam Sanusi further alleged that NNPC’s account had not been audited since 2005! This, undoubtedly, is sacrilegious.

The original Legislation setting up NNPC on 1st April, 1977 stated in Section19: “The Corporation shall prepare and submit to the National Council of Ministers, through the Minister not later than 30th June in each financial year, a report on the activities of the Corporation during the immediately preceding financial year, and shall include in such report a copy of the audited accounts of the Corporation for that year and the auditors' report thereon.”

How did NNPC slide, from the original intent as a transparent institution, and lately, into the conduit pipe for larcenous endeavours of the existential powers in the land?

Understandably, the activities of NNPC must come into sharp focus because the Nigerian state is largely dependent on Oil exports for its survival.

In Nigeria’s fourth attempt at constitutional democracy that started in 1999, four refineries in not-optimal shapes were inherited. The PDP-led administration of Chief Olusegun Obasanjo found it necessary to increase pump price of fuel six times between 29th May, 1999 and 29th May, 2007; each time, justification for these increases was the imperative of increasing world crude prices. 

But observers have always been quick to ask: what happened to the time-honoured allocation of crude to the refineries for Local consumption? Again, the buck-passing of refineries operating at less than installed capacity was blamed for the non-utilization of this allocation. The logical response from Citizens was, should the institutional inefficiency of the NNPC in managing the refineries be visited on them?

However, the stench from the malodorous operation of the NNPC has not been as unbearable as from 2009 till date. The Thisday newspaper report of 27th February, 2014 captioned: “NEITI says NNPC didn’t disclose $22.8Billion in audit report.” An excerpt of the report reads: “Barely a day after the House of Representatives ad hoc committee commenced investigation of the report of the Swiss-based Non-Governmental Organisation (NGO), Berne Declaration, involving the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC) and Swiss-based companies, another weighty revelation by the Nigerian Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (NEITI), has revealed that the sum of $22.8 billion was not disclosed by the NNPC in NEITI's audited financial statement on the corporation through alternative funding arrangement with its joint venture partners.

The Executive Secretary of NEITI, Mrs. Zainab Shamsuna Ahmed, disclosed this to the committee yesterday, explaining that the amount not captured in the report was, according to NEITI audit report of 2009 to 2011, supposed to be part of the corporation's financial statements through alternative funding arrangement with its joint venture partners. She debunked NNPC's denial that it did not connive with some Swiss oil dealers to deprive the federal government of oil revenue of $6.8 billion that should have accrued to it as a result of the crude oil lifting contract the corporation granted the companies. Ahmed further revealed that from 2009 to 2011, the country lost N98.3 billion to NNPC in exchange rates compared to Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) official exchange rate in the year under review. She corroborated the subsisting allegation by the Bernes declaration report, which was the precursor of the ongoing investigation, saying:

"There is similarity in NEITI audit report and the Bernes Declaration report. The report (Bernes Declaration report) has a lot of substance in it. "If it is taken for what it is, then what we need to do is bring greater transparency and better disclosures. Then it will be a useful process." She even offered that her organisation "go back and link the Bernes declaration report with NEITI audit report. "Non-cash call items totaling $1.73 billion were financed from the CBN/NNPC/JP Morgan Chase Cash Call Dollar Account. This reduced the amount available for funding JV operations with the attendant implications of NNPC seeking alternative funding arrangements to fund cash call shortfalls." She, equally basing her submission on NEITI audit report of 2009-2011, picked holes in NNPC's allocation of 445, 000 barrels per day to local refineries. "The 445,000 barrels per day allocation should be reviewed to the actual refining capacity of the refineries," she suggested. Ahmed, who also alleged that $1.73 billion meant for Joint Venture cash calls have been diverted by NNPC, urged the federal government to consider the privatisation of refineries and ensure that pipeline security is enhanced.”

Dateline: 1st January, 2012: The Federal Government, through the recommendation of the Ministry of Petroleum resources, increased the pump price from N65 to N140.

Understandably there were loud protests across the land. For the first time, Nigerians (in diaspora) joined their Compatriots in staging ‘occupy Nigeria’ protests at Nigerian embassies and consulates abroad. The protests in Lagos were the most organized and coordinated because of the Bakare-led Save Nigeria Group (SNG). After about two weeks of sustained protests, soldiers drafted from the 81st Division of the Nigerian Army in Lagos, and commanded by then Major-General Kenneth Minimah (now Lt-Gen and Chief of Army Staff) ensured the truncation of the protests. At the end of the protests, the Jonathan regime reduced the Pump price to N97, representing 49.23% increase of the original pump price!

The Nation’s consciousness was first aroused to the NNPC’s humongous oil subsidy payment scam by the Senator Bukola Saraki. Alleging that, though N240Billion was budgeted (meaning N20Billion/month), the expenditure thus far had outstripped the budget.

This led to discovery of huge can of worms. Eventually, the House of Representatives resolved, through its constitutional over-sight function, to probe the Fuel Subsidy regime (2009-2011).

Indeed, more sordid details were unearthed! In the adopted report of its ad-hoc committee led by Mr Farouk Lawan, the House informed the Nigerian public, inter-alia, that “payment of N999 million 128 times in 24 hours by the accountant general between 12th and 13th January 2009.” The Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) further corroborated that assertion that the payments were made to PPPRA's account and further paid to 52 companies. With some tinge of prophetic candour, the House Speaker, Rt (Hon) Aminu Tambuwal announced at the adoption of the report: “We are fighting against entrenched interests whose infectious greed has (hurt) our people,” House Speaker Aminu Waziri Tambuwal said. “Therefore, be mindful they will fight back and they normally do fight dirty.” Mr Femi Otedola, Chairman of Zenon oil and a friend of the regime, alerted the Nation that Mr Farouk Lawan demanded for $3Million bribe from him in exchange of writing favourable report on his companies. He further averred that a sum of $620,000 had been collected from him in three installments. According to Thisday Newspaper report of 11th June, 2012, Mr Otedola gave his account of the bribery saga:

“Then a day before the report was to be submitted, Lawan called again, informing me that Zenon’s name had been included in the report. “I, of course, was very angry and asked him to desist from his course of action, but Lawan insisted that I must pay up as other oil marketers had done before me.” Otedola said he could not believe his eyes the next day when the report came out and Zenon’s name had been listed under the category of companies that had bought foreign exchange from the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) but had not imported petrol.

The amount ascribed to Zenon in the report was $232,975,385.13. The report had recommended that Zenon and 14 other marketers that had bought the foreign exchange be referred to the anti-corruption agencies to determine what they used the monies for. Otedola said at this point he again called Lawan demanding that Zenon’s name be removed from the list, as there was no way his company could have bought that volume of foreign exchange without importing products.

"I reminded him that the amount ascribed to Zenon was wrong as what the company bought was over $400 million for importation of products through the banks – Zenith, UBA and GTB – and that under Sanusi (CBN governor) there was no way anyone could have bought that quantity of foreign exchange and not imported the products having filled the Form M. “Sanusi will simply clamp down on anyone who tries to pull that kind of stunt,” he said. In spite of this, Otedola said Lawan still demanded that the members of the committee be given money in exchange for removing Zenon’s name from the report before it is considered in plenary by the entire House. Otedola said he then asked how much would be required to make the committee happy, to which Lawan responded $3 million. “I screamed at him, demanding to know why he was doing this to me. All he said was other marketers were paying up to keep their names out of the report so I should do likewise,” he said. Otedola revealed that it was this point he decided to involve the security agencies to catch Lawan and his committee with their hands in the till. According to him, “As a law-abiding citizen, I decided to involve the security agencies and they advised me to play along, which prompted me to offer to pay part of the money with the promise that I would pay the balance when my company’s name had been removed from the report." The security agencies, he disclosed, gave him serialised dollar bills for the sting job and there are call logs, video and audio recordings in the possession of the agencies to confirm all that had transpired between himself and Lawan.

He said on April 21, the Saturday before the plenary, Lawan came in person to his residence and collected $250,000 in cash, as the first installment, “then the next Monday night he came and collected another $250,000. “On Tuesday, at 9am, just before the House commenced seating, Boniface came and collected another $120,000.” Otedola confirmed that during the sting, Lawan and Boniface collected a total of $620,000 in three installments as part of the $3 million demanded from him. He added that with the $620,000 that had been extorted by Lawan and the committee, during the plenary, Zenon’s name was removed from the list of companies that had bought foreign exchange but did not import products. Otedola continued: “He (Lawan) now asked for the balance of $2.5 million, but when I told him that I had no money now that the money was in Lagos, he suggested that I should charter a plane to fly the money from Lagos to Abuja.”

We later got to know that it was the Directorate of State Security (DSS) that was involved in the supposed sting operation that turned blank because it did not lead to the arrest of Mr Farouk Lawan with the alleged marked money. The relevant questions are, did the DSS set out to arrest Mr Farouk Lawan or a Bigger fish in the House of Representatives? The follow up to this is, why did they have to leave their marked operation money with Mr Farouk Lawan for over 30 days before Mr Otedola announced the bribe allegation to the Nation? The prosecution of the case against has run into murky waters because Mr Farouk Lawan was not arrested immediately with the alleged bribe money.

What, perhaps, remains the most damning of the Fuel Subsidy regime was the KPMG report which the NNPC deliberately ensured was not in circulation for over a year.

According to the Premium Times, the 41-page report showed NNPC as a cesspool of monumental corruption and fraud. The report detailed the corporation’s sharp business practices, violation of laid down rules and regulations, illegal deductions of funds belonging to the state, and failure to account for several billions of naira that should go to the federation account. The agency, the report says, has also severely defrauded our country in subsidy claims.

Auditors found that between 2007 and 2009 alone, the NNPC over-deducted funds in subsidy claims to the tune of N28.5bn. It has not been able to account for the sum ever since. The over-deduction from its remittance to the federation account for 2010 and 2011, believed to be in several billions of naira, is not captured in the report. The Federal Government, through the Federal Ministry of Finance, hired KPMG and another Nigerian auditing firm, S.S. Afemikhe & Co., in July 2010, to look into the books of the corporation following allegations of “wrongful deductions at source by the NNPC to fund its operations” by the 36 state governors.

There were also concerns at the time that “the procedures for managing and reporting the country’s crude oil and gas revenues are opaque and characterized by gaps, overlaps and inconsistencies in the role of key parties responsible for the assessment, collection and reporting on these revenue streams.”

Officials of the petroleum ministry and the NNPC, a source at the finance ministry disclosed, developed cold feet after the auditors were sent in, and indeed tried hard to frustrate the representatives of the two audit firms by failing to supply evaluation criteria for commercial bids submitted in respect of petroleum products importation. Believing that would turn the auditors away, our source further explained, the corporation also failed to provide them with other relevant documents such as the criteria for allocation of products and product volumes to importers/suppliers and periodic prequalification list of approved products importers/suppliers. But in spite of the difficulty they faced, the auditors were able to determine that the NNPC had been anything but transparent in the management of our country’s oil resources.

The report that emerged from the audit was just too damning that the leadership of the petroleum ministry, the NNPC and some few other elements in the Federal Government have worked hard to keep it away from the 36 state governors and federal lawmakers in particular and Nigerians in general. In what is likely to anger state governors, the audit established that the corporation was in the habit of arbitrarily estimating subsidy claims and then over-deducting funds from proceeds of domestic crude sales. “For example,” the report said, N25bn was deducted as subsidy estimate for September 2009 from domestic crude sales proceeds while PPPRA approved a subsidy of N23.8bn. N35bn was also deducted as subsidy estimate fro November 2009 but PPPRA approved of N21.3bn.” The auditors’ analysis indicates “over-deduction for these two months amounted to N14.9bn. However, only N4.2.bn was swept into the Federation Account by the NNPC as adjustment for subsidy claimable in the two months.”

That is beside the N11.8bn subsidy claim the NNPC claimed it paid for imported products that didn’t reach consumers. State governors have always complained that the NNPC was shortchanging them through illegal deductions from revenues payable to the federation account. Over-deduction is however not the only way the corporation is defrauding the federal and state governments. According to laid down regulations, the NNPC is invoiced in dollars for domestic crude allocations but is expected to remit the equivalent naira value to the Federation Account. But auditors found to their chagrin that in doing that, the corporation used exchange rates far lower than those published by the Central Bank of Nigeria.

Using this “fraudulent underhand tactics”, the NNPC succeeded in cheating the three levels of government of a whooping N85.2bn in three years – N25.7bn in 2007, N33.8bn in 2008 and N26.7bn in 2009. When the auditors requested explanations for these exchange rate disparities, the NNPC claimed it obtained the exchange rates it used from the CBN via telephone. The report also severely indicted the NNPC over the shoddy and non-transparent manner it renews crude sale contracts every year. The auditors noted that “evaluation criteria for renewal of contracts are not clearly stated in the contract document”, and that the selection exercises were based on individual discretion and wrong assumptions and criteria.” The NNPC claims that renewal of contract was based on performance of off-takers (buyers). But the auditors observed that the basis and process for determining performance were not clearly defined. The auditors wondered why in 2007 and 2008, some companies not on the approved list of buyers for that year were allocated crude, a practice the examiners believe had led to crude being sold to non-credible buyers, even with relevant guarantees and safeguards not implemented. Specifically the auditors queried the allocation of crude to Ovlas Trading (2, 852,316 barrels in 2007 and 906, 269 barrels in 2008) Petrojam (2,818,914 in 2007), Oil Fields (950,166 barrels in 2007) and Zenon (906,000 barrels in 2008) even when they were not on the list of authorized buyers for that year. Contracts for the importation of products, the auditors wrote, were also routinely awarded without regard for approved guidelines and procedures.

"We observed that contracts for the importation of petroleum products were awarded to companies and suppliers not listed in the approved prequalification list used for the fourth quarter 2008 importation,” the report noted.

The auditors specifically queried the award of contracts in that manner to Astana Oil Corporation Limited, Natural Energy and Oando, when they were not prequalified for patronage that year. Among other forms of misdemeanour, ranging from poor accounting to shoddy record keeping, the auditors also indicted the corporation for leaving its own storage facilities, unused, and then proceeding to incur additional cost from leasing of third party storage facilities.

The auditors reported that DPK tanks (with storage capacity of 18,000 cubic metres) at the PPMC depots within the Mosimi Area had not been used for three years even though they were in good condition. Yet the corporation, the examiners added, had been leasing storage facilities from third parties.

NNPC, as a roguish institution, is not in short supply of credible consultants to launder its besmirched reputation. In 2012, at a Lagos Town-meeting, a media PR stunt put together by one its consultants, some notable Nigerians made presentations to argue for or against the existence and need for a subsidy regime.

The CBN governor, Mallam Sanusi Lamido Sanusi, argued that there was, indeed, existence of subsidy Payments because he had seen $8Billion payments twice, totaling $16Billion. Amongst the presenters that day was a popular Human Rights Activist and Senior Member of the Nigerian Bar, who made compelling arguments about the anomalies of the management of the subsidy payments. This Lagos outing was exactly the opportunity to ingratiate himself into the PR consultancy of the NNPC. When the CBN governor, Mallam Sanusi was suspended by the President, in what is still a subject of contention at the Court, this bloke was part of the ‘crucify him’ lynch mob that the NNPC put together to fight its war.

And the reason for his position, “Sanusi talks too much.” The question is, what has Sanusi’s loquacity got to do with Nation’s monetary policy of managing Inflation and interest rate? Is this the normal Nigerian style of ‘if you cannot controvert the message, shoot down the messenger’?

What is very perplexing in Nigeria at this time is that the President seems, from all intents and purposes, to be providing ‘steely shield’ to the egregious malfeasance in the NNPC. In June 2013, the President demanded some explanations based on the observations raised by the Financial Reporting Council of Nigeria (FRCN). These were promptly responded with the proviso that further clarification could be provided if needed.

There was no response from FRCN. In September, the CBN governor, Mallam Sanusi , wrote the President that there was documentary evidence to show that NNPC had not been remitting all accruable revenue from oil exports to the Federation Account. Three months later, the former President wrote an angry missive to Mr President; the corruption and fraudulent practice in NNPC came into focus. The President was irked and demanded Sanusi’s resignation and the latter refused, citing the CBN Act as not giving the President sole authority to sack him. Miffed by sheer audacity of the CBN governor in challenging his authority, he sought for ways to shove the irritant out of the way. Yes, the weapon of suspension! This was deployed on Justice Ayo Salami, the retired Court of Appeal, who could have embarrassed the President at the Presidential Elections Petitions Tribunal in 2011 with a judgment on INEC, the electoral umpire for its taciturnity in availing the Petitioner with relevant electoral materials against the earlier order of the Court. Less than a week before he could give his Judgment of the Motion, he was suspended indefinitely and never returned to his office until he clocked the mandatory three score and ten years, thus quietly retired.

The President has honed his skill in using this option for those that his office cannot unilaterally sack without concurrence by the Senate. So, in February, 2014, Sanusi was suspended on the basis of the dusted FRCN report and a petition by a former Bank chief, Mr Erastus Akingbola. Against the Law of natural justice, the President gave the order for Sanusi’s suspension. Thinking that Sanusi would force his way into his office after his suspension, a contingent of Police men was deployed to keep ‘peace’ around the CBN premises. The unmistakable message is that an imperial president is on the throne and, with a readiness to crush all opposition with impunity. For the avoidance of doubt, any attempt to disrupt the ceaseless flow of slush funds from NNPC shall equally be crushed. In his response to the President’s suspension letter vis-à-vis the issues raised by FRCN, Mallam Sanusi admonished the President:

"Having provided detailed explanations, backed by verifiable documents, it is my sincere wish that His Excellency, Mr President, in line with his adherence to fairness and justice, will apply the same rationale and rigour to other agencies of the Federal Government that have had serious allegations and queries levied against them, and prevail upon them to provide responses and explanations with the same level of clarity and transparency.”

With the President’s decided biased slant, it is doubtful if all the humongous irregularities in the NNPC shall be visited with the same level of rigour and scrutiny that the CBN has been subjected to lately. However, what we have noticed is that NNPC, under this regime, has become a citadel of institutionalized opacity and deceit. As Nationals, we shall continue to shout from the housetops, where is the $20Billion which Sanusi said was never remitted to the federation account? There are verifiable that need to be stressed:

The $8.7Billion allegedly expended on kerosene subsidy was not appropriated by the National Assembly!
$20Billion is the equivalent of Enugu State’s Federal Allocation for 84 years (using November 2013 FAAC Figures)!
$20Billion can provide any of these for Nigeria:
· 20,000 kilometers of roads (world class).
· 1,666 world-class hospitals.
· 20,000 Megawatts of Electricity, which easily dwarfs the less than 4,000Megawatts currently generated!
· Pay 160,000 Teachers for 50 years.
· Pay 53 million poorest and most-economically vulnerable Nigerians N5,000 in a year. This is why we shall continue to demand for our money from the powers governing NNPC.

Where is our Money, our common Patrimony? Definitely, this house of deceit MUST fall!
Engr. Rotimi Fashakin.
Email: rotfash@yahoo.com
(0803-302-5866).






I want to build a stronger APC in Delta State.....Emerhor

 Olorogun O'tega Emerhor addressing issues during the meeting of  Delta Progressive Change Forum at Asaba, with other leaders of the Forum.
 Across section of members at the meeting.
Sir Olisa-Emeka Akamukalia sharing more inshight on the progressiveness of the APC in the state and the timeliness of the forum.

Slave Trade: Western Actors roles and Impact In Nigeria





A desire for glory and profit from trade, missionary zeal, and considerations of global strategy brought Portuguese navigators to the West African coast in the late fifteenth century. Locked in a seemingly interminable crusading war with Muslim Morocco, the Portuguese conceived of a plan whereby maritime expansion might bypass the Islamic world and open new markets that would result in commercial gain. They hoped to tap the fabled Saharan gold trade, establish a sea route around Africa to India, and link up with the mysterious Christian kingdom of Prester John. 

The Portuguese achieved all these goals. They obtained access to the gold trade by trading along the Gulf of Guinea, establishing a base at Elmina ("the mine") on the Gold Coast (Ghana), and they made their way into the Indian Ocean, militarily securing a monopoly of the spice trade. Even the Christian kingdom turned out to be real; it was Ethiopia, although Portuguese adventures there turned sour very quickly. Portugal's lasting legacy for Nigeria, however, was its initiation of the transatlantic slave trade. 

By 1471 Portuguese ships had reconnoitered the West African coast south as far as the Niger Delta, although they did not know that it was the delta, and in 1481 emissaries from the king of Portugal visited the court of the oba of Benin. For a time, Portugal and Benin maintained close relations. Portuguese soldiers aided Benin in its wars; Portuguese even came to be spoken at the oba's court. Gwatto, the port of Benin, became the depot to handle the peppers, ivory, and increasing numbers of slaves offered by the oba in exchange for coral beads; textile imports from India; European-manufactured articles, including tools and weapons; and manillas (brass and bronze bracelets that were used as currency and also were melted down for objets d'art). Portugal also may have been the first European power to import cowrie shells, which were the currency of the far interior. 

Benin profited from its close ties with the Portuguese and exploited the firearms bought from them to tighten its hold on the lower Niger area. Two factors checked the spread of Portuguese influence and the continued expansion of Benin, however. 

First, Portugal stopped buying pepper because of the availability of other spices in the Indian Ocean region. Second, Benin placed an embargo on the export of slaves, thereby isolating itself from the growth of what was to become the major export from the Nigerian coast for 300 years. Benin continued to capture slaves and to employ them in its domestic economy, but the Edo state remained unique among Nigerian polities in refusing to participate in the transatlantic trade. In the long run, Benin remained relatively isolated from the major changes along the Nigerian coast. 

The Portuguese initially bought slaves for resale on the Gold Coast, where slaves were traded for gold. For this reason, the southwestern coast of Nigeria and neighboring parts of the present-day Republic of Benin (not to be confused with the kingdom of Benin) became known as the "slave coast." When the African coast began to supply slaves to the Americas in the last third of the sixteenth century, the Portuguese continued to look to the Bight of Benin as one of its sources of supply. 

By then they were concentrating activities on the Angolan coast, which supplied roughly 40 percent of all slaves shipped to the Americas throughout the duration of the transatlantic trade, but they always maintained a presence on the Nigerian coast. 

The Portuguese monopoly on West African trade was broken at the end of the sixteenth century, when Portugal's influence was challenged by the rising naval power of the Netherlands. The Dutch took over Portuguese trading stations on the coast that were the source of slaves for the Americas. French and English competition later undermined the Dutch position. 

Although slave ports from Lagos to Calabar would see the flags of many other European maritime countries (including Denmark, Sweden, and Brandenburg) and the North American colonies, Britain became the dominant slaving power in the eighteenth century. Its ships handled two-fifths of the transatlantic traffic during the century. The Portuguese and French were responsible for another two-fifths. 

Nigeria kept its important position in the slave trade throughout the great expansion of the transatlantic trade after the middle of the seventeenth century. Slightly more slaves came from the Nigerian coast than from Angola in the eighteenth century, while in the nineteenth century perhaps 30 percent of all slaves sent across the Atlantic came from Nigeria. Over the period of the whole trade, more than 3.5 million slaves were shipped from Nigeria to the Americas. 

Most of these slaves were Igbo and Yoruba, with significant concentrations of Hausa, Ibibio, and other ethnic groups. In the eighteenth century, two polities--Oyo and the Aro confederacy--were responsible for most of the slaves exported from Nigeria. The Aro confederacy continued to export slaves through the 1830s, but most slaves in the nineteenth century were a product of the Yoruba civil wars that followed the collapse of Oyo in the 1820s. 

The expansion of Oyo after the middle of the sixteenth century was closely associated with the growth of slave exports across the Atlantic. Oyo's cavalry pushed southward along a natural break in the forests (known as the Benin Gap, i.e., the opening in the forest where the savanna stretched to the Bight of Benin), and thereby gained access to the coastal ports. 

Oyo experienced a series of power struggles and constitutional crises in the eighteenth century that directly related to its success as a major slave exporter. The powerful Oyo Mesi, the council of warlords that checked the king, forced a number of kings to commit suicide. In 1754 the head of the Oyo Mesi, basorun Gaha, seized power, retaining a series of kings as puppets. The rule of this military oligarchy was overcome in 1789, when King Abiodun successfully staged a countercoup and forced the suicide of Gaha. 

Abiodun and his successors maintained the supremacy of the monarchy until the second decade of the nineteenth century, primarily because of the reliance of the king on a cavalry force that was independent of the Oyo Mesi. This force was recruited largely from Muslim slaves, especially Hausa, from farther north.

The other major slave-exporting state was a loose confederation under the leadership of the Aro, an Igbo clan of mixed Igbo and Ibibio origins, whose home was on the escarpment between the central Igbo districts and the Cross River. Beginning in the late seventeenth century, the Aro built a complex network of alliances and treaties with many of the Igbo clans. They served as arbiters in villages throughout Igboland, and their famous oracle at Arochukwu, located in a thickly wooded gorge, was widely regarded as a court of appeal for many kinds of disputes. 

By custom the Aro were sacrosanct, allowing them to travel anywhere with their goods without fear of attack. Alliances with certain Igbo clans who acted as mercenaries for the Aro guaranteed their safety. As oracle priests, they also received slaves in payment of fines or dedicated to the gods by their masters as scapegoats for their own transgressions. These slaves thereby became the property of the Aro priests, who were at liberty to sell them. 

Besides their religious influence, the Aro established their ascendancy through a combination of commercial acumen and diplomatic skill. Their commercial empire was based on a set of twenty-four-day fairs and periodic markets that dotted the interior. Resident Aro dominated these markets and collected slaves for export. They had a virtual monopoly of the slave trade after the collapse of Oyo in the 1820s. 

Villages suspected of violating treaties with the Aro were subject to devastating raids that not only produced slaves for export but also maintained Aro influence. The Aro had treaties with the coastal ports from which slaves were exported, especially Calabar, Bonny, and Elem Kalabari. The people of Calabar were Efik, a subsection of Ibibio, while Bonny and Elem Kalabari were Ijaw towns. 

The Ijaw, who occupied the tidal area in proximity to the Igbo, had wrested a frugal living from the sale of dried fish and sea salt to the inland communities for centuries before the rise of the slave trade. Traditionally, they had lived in federated groups of villages with the head of the ranking village presiding over general assemblies attended by all the males. During the heyday of the slave trade in the eighteenth century, the major Ijaw villages grew into cities of 5,000 to 10,000 inhabitants ruled by local strongmen allied with the Aro. Their economies were based on the facilities they offered to slave traders. 

They were entrepreneurial communities, receiving slaves from the Aro for resale to European agents. Personal wealth rather than status within a lineage group was the basis for political power and social status. Government typically was conducted by councils composed of leading merchants and headed by an amanyanabo (chief executive), an office that in time became hereditary. 

By the end of the eighteenth century, the area that was to become Nigeria was far from a unified country. Furthermore, the orientation of the north and the south was entirely different. The savanna states of Hausaland and Borno had experienced a difficult century of political insecurity and ecological disaster but otherwise continued in a centuries-long tradition of slow political and economic change that was similar to other parts of the savanna. 

The southern areas near the coast, by contrast, had been swept up in the transatlantic slave trade. Political and economic change had been rapid and dramatic. By 1800 Oyo governed much of southwestern Nigeria and neighboring parts of the modern Republic of Benin, while the Aro had consolidated southeastern Nigeria into a confederation that dominated that region. 

The Oyo and the Aro confederations were major trading partners of the slave traders from Europe and North America.